View Full Version : JS Ratingsv Daggers
Jantje
03-01-2008, 09:44 PM
Loach 6 - not a lot to do
Starosta 6.5 decent going forward
Hecky 5 struggled today
Wethers 6 struggled with Daggers set pieces
Moncur 6.5 as above but pace helped out at times
Colbeck 7 did ok and showed he wanted it
Bullock 5 swamped in MF again due to lack of partner
Nix 4 very poor
Rhodes 3 garbage, can't manage 2 games a week
Daley 3 lazy & uninterested
Thorne 7 never stopped trying but didn't get a decent chance
Subs
Conlon 2 nuff said
Topp 6 tried to make things happen
Penford 3 not long enough
would agree but 5 for nix the little lad necer stops trying but did struggle
Thorne did fuck all and even though he tried didnt deserve owt but a 5
a bit unfair to slam pebford for the size of his tackle :rolleyes:
Colbeck by a million miles best player again
Dr Wisey
03-01-2008, 11:07 PM
Loach 5.5
Hecky 5.5
Wethers 5.5
Moncur 6
Sarosta 5.5
Colbeck 6.5
Nix 5
Bullock 6
Rhodes 5
Thorne 5.5
Daley 3
Subs
Bazza 5
Topp 6
Penford - not on long enough
Man of Match - Colbeck
Daggers wanted it more and deserved the win.
Yeadon Bantam
03-02-2008, 10:08 AM
WTF rhodes looked keen for me especialliy in 2nd half...........
Colbeck was awesome. Moncur is a great passer!
Maybe for next away game......
4-1-3-2 with tom moncur sitting just in front of the defence??
Jantje
03-02-2008, 10:54 AM
WTF rhodes looked keen for me especialliy in 2nd half...........
Colbeck was awesome. Moncur is a great passer!
Maybe for next away game......
4-1-3-2 with tom moncur sitting just in front of the defence??
Adie, Rhodes was absolute garbage. He didn't beat his man once, put i think 1 decent cross in and looked jaded. Probably a lack of fitness and match practice more than anything.
BantamLad89
03-02-2008, 12:07 PM
WTF rhodes looked keen for me especialliy in 2nd half...........
Colbeck was awesome. Moncur is a great passer!
Maybe for next away game......
4-1-3-2 with tom moncur sitting just in front of the defence??
Remember the threw ball that he should of chased? And he just walked back casually...Imagine if Omar did that!?
Colbeck wasn't that good, set up one chance and thats it, Rhodes and Colbeck had so much chances to put Omar threw but one of Rhodes passes to him went out of play.
Colbeck wasn't awesome, but on Tuesday he was, if you compared Joe to tuesday and Saturdays performance he was appalling.
Johnny Yen
03-02-2008, 01:08 PM
I give Daley a mark of '1'
And that's only because he bothered to put his kit on.
Parrot
03-02-2008, 01:14 PM
I give Daley a mark of '1'
And that's only because he bothered to put his kit on.
Surely he deserves another 1 for his amber boots?:rolleyes:
Colbeck was crap yesterday IMO, I can't understand why people thought he was brilliant?
Saying that of course I'd have given everyone a 1 for yesterdays performance, except Conlon who would get -8973897498749834798479834794837498.
Bantam Jay
03-02-2008, 02:18 PM
Loach - 6
Starosta - 6
Wetherall - 5
Moncur - 6
Heckingbottom - 5
Colbeck - 7 MOTM
Bullock - 6
Nix - 5
Rhodes - 5
Thorne - 7
Daley - 6
Conlon - 0
Penford - 4
Topp - 5
Colbeck was crap yesterday IMO, I can't understand why people thought he was brilliant?
Saying that of course I'd have given everyone a 1 for yesterdays performance, except Conlon who would get -8973897498749834798479834794837498.
are you serious ????? He was the only one who could be arsed he beat his man a few times got crosses in and was winning us freekicks all over the pitch.
I cant understand how people's views on this game vary so much:confused:
tony d
03-02-2008, 07:49 PM
are you serious ????? He was the only one who could be arsed he beat his man a few times got crosses in and was winning us freekicks all over the pitch.
Spot on that.. Went looking for the ball and got stuck in... Run at the left back and got in a few crosses.. Wasted a few but his effort was there unlike so many others..
Rhodes had a shocker, in fact the only other player of note for me was Moncur.
A good defender but his ball distribution was poor..
Apparently that was his worst game too according to someone i was chatting to in the BB.. So he must be a decent prospect unfortunately not for us though...
Thorne cannot be blamed yesterday as he had poor service throughout and only became lively when Conlon came on..
Macca was as much to blame as anyone though as he could have put those subs on a hell of alot earlier..
Daley Rhodes and 1 from the back four should have come off for Conlon, Topp and Penford much earlier considering we were 1-0 down and playing shite.....
The lack of any creation in the middle is the biggest problem that we have and because of that the ball is thrown from back to front..
One of the worst performances i have seen for a while and according to Ranger that is as good as it has been for a while...
If that is true there must be some real shit in this division..
are you serious ????? He was the only one who could be arsed he beat his man a few times got crosses in and was winning us freekicks all over the pitch.
I cant understand how people's views on this game vary so much:confused:
I kept seeing him knacking his first touch up, doing a Muirhead and not looking up when he got the ball, not crossing quick enough or with the necessary quality, just generally being ineffective. I thought it was bread and butter for Daggers when it came to dealing with him. Nowhere near as effective as Tuesday night.
Maybe I just noticed his bad points more but I thought he had a stinker along with a few others.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.