Updated Rules List

[Rick]

1)No Spamming/Posting of unnecessary/irrelevant posts just to increase post count.

2)No disruptive, offensive or abusive behaviour, contributions should be constructive, not with the intention of causing trouble/confrontations.

3)No unlawful or objectionable content: harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive or otherwise objectionable material is not acceptable and will be deleted and the user may be banned.

4)If you use multiple logins for the purpose of disrupting the community or annoying other users you may be banned.

5)No impersonation of other users.

6)No inappropriate (e.g. vulgar, offensive etc) user names.

7) An effort is made bythe Admin/Mods to read all posts but if you feel anything is missed, use the report this message option if you are offended by a thread, this will ensure confidentiality.

8) All admin/mods reserve the right to edit or delete posts deemed offensive, or not on topic.

Please list any questions regarding these rules below and we will try to answer them as quickly as possible.

[Kop Kred]

Yep...Good.

Re: Rule 4.

"If you use multiple logins for the purpose of disrupting the community or annoying other users you may be banned."

Can you quailfy this one please, it's still a little ambiguous.

Are you saying they are allowed again?

Tnx.

[Ed]

You can providing that they are not used in any malicious way, If we see this being abused then the rule will change.

Let's try see how much fun we can have :)

I don't want us to come accross as killjoy's I want the place to be fun - If it starts going the way of the OMB with insults - Action will be taken! :)

[Kop Kred]

Thank You!
:)

[Bradford Loyal]

Nah, I still don't agree with it. Offensive or not someone using an alias is still posting something he or she would rather not say using their original username. To tell you the truth I find the thought of someone I wouldn't normally give the time of day to is sat at their compy wetting themselves like a girl while I have a nicey nicey chat with their alter ego quite sickening.

One user, ONE USERNAME! PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!!

[Bantam Of The Opera]

I actually agree with Bradford Loyal on this one, i really dont see what purpose multiple identities serve. In the end this is one of the main reasons the OMB went the way it did, you just couldnt keep track of who was who.

[tony d]

I disagree with Loyal completely FOR ONCE as his point is not relevant and not thought out...

In short hes wrong as usual, whereas i would now like to put forward my view on this, which is, more thought out and gets to the point of the matter. Here it is then,

only one user name to be allowed ...

Thank you.... :D

[Serium]

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN

Why ban them, you want this to turn into a nursing home conversation site? Alter ego's are what makes MB's fun!