Rhodes in/out not sure [Archive] - Claret & Banter: Bradford City Forums: Bradford City Discussion

View Full Version : Rhodes in/out not sure

tony d

02-13-2007, 12:00 PM

Let us try again for those with lingering doubts on the validaty of the last one...jump:

Now i know it was quite a landslide in favour of JR going by the same folk who you would expect to see voting that way..

But im interested to see if the sacking of Todd has changed your view in anyway..Less the obvious yawnster that is...

ChuckleBantam

02-13-2007, 12:05 PM

Rhodes Out!

I'm till not Gullible enough to overlook how useless he is over the fact he was forced to make a decision popular to the masses to save his own hide.

Parrot

02-13-2007, 12:56 PM

OUT! tup:....He sacked Turd about 15 months too late & his latest blunder in the timing of the sacking could backfire....Whoever comes in now hasn't much room to manouvere, regarding bringing players in & out, plus JRs sold our main goalscorer into the bargain!....But i suppose the Turd lovers will say he'd have kept us up if the new man fails to avoid the drop, wont they?:rolleyes:

gaza75

02-13-2007, 01:02 PM

Still OUT the decision was way over due and it does not make up for the way the club is being run at the moment.

king billy

02-13-2007, 01:09 PM

Lot closer this un Tone eh?....tup:

eurobantam

02-13-2007, 01:16 PM

its a stupid question. Rhodes is in charge because his family own the club. If another buyer came in I am sure he would bite his hand off. Ok, so he could resign, retain ownership and delegate to a chief executive, but the Rhodes' would still have the final word on any major decisions.

tony d

02-13-2007, 01:30 PM

Lot closer this un Tone eh?....tup:

Which one this one???

Or the first one prior to Todds sacking where it was 17 outers and three inners????

So yep i would say this is closer mate...

BTW alot who posted on my first one havent come back on yet :rolleyes:

matnab

02-13-2007, 05:14 PM

As before, providing theres someone to step in as Chairman.

yankeebantam

02-14-2007, 01:15 AM

in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!yes it took him 15 months too long to get rid of turd but theres no yankee or muzzer showing any interest in putting the odd 300 million into the coffers so for him to just walk now ,surely that would be the end of bradford city would it not:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Yeadon Bantam

02-14-2007, 08:17 AM

It wouldn't be the end as Rhodes isn't putting anymore money in anyway....

king billy

02-14-2007, 08:45 AM

More people have voted on this poll than the last one Tone - and the results are pretty much the opposite which would suggest that the other poll did contain a loaded question....;) tup:

Rick

02-14-2007, 08:47 AM

No ones voted unsure so I might fill that void.

tony d

02-14-2007, 09:14 AM

More people have voted on this poll than the last one Tone - and the results are pretty much the opposite which would suggest that the other poll did contain a loaded question....;) tup:

What Chuckles identical pre Todd sacking one???? I think not old chap...I would say on the basis of the evidence alone that the swing is due to Todd going and not many want Rhodes to go for any other reason...

Rhodes Out!! 17 ................77.27%
Rhodes Stay!! 5 .................22.73%

It has gone on identical format and gonme from 1/5 wanting him not to go to around half mate...

I reckon if you did the poll at the ground before the game then in reality only a small minority would want Rhodes to go...

Oh you mean my other one.....

ChuckleBantam

02-14-2007, 11:32 AM

tony d

02-14-2007, 04:13 PM

More still want him out than in though. The only difference between your poll and mine tone, is it highlights how fickle and easily pleased some fans are by changing their minds simply because a manager has been removed. Thankfully it looks as though the BIG picture isn't lost on so many people any more.

I think if you did a poll on saturday dave the stats would be alot different than 20 blokes on a MB...

Im sure you think it would be for the outers but i wouldnt expect it being a loss for JR...

I would also say that i doubt it is because they are easily pleaseed Dave...Probably see things alot different to you thats all..

It's like me saying you are just bitter and twisted as are the ones who voted for him to go...Not all would be as not all are easily pleased mate...

beerbantam

02-14-2007, 04:15 PM

ChuckleBantam

02-14-2007, 05:14 PM

Only on this site though Chuckle, which accounts for about .005% of City fans!!

In the real world average fans really dont think about Rhodes!!:rolleyes:

And that my friend, is why you and the average fans will soon be spending your Saturday afternoons at Bradford Park Avenue.

beerbantam

02-14-2007, 05:24 PM

And that my friend, is why you and the average fans will soon be spending your Saturday afternoons at Bradford Park Avenue.

I wont mate!tup:

Try looking at your glass as half full for a change mate!:rolleyes:

ChuckleBantam

02-14-2007, 05:29 PM

I wont mate!tup:

Try looking at your glass as half full for a change mate!:rolleyes:

Give me a reason to. Don't say the change of manager, because results won't improve one bit. What will you use as an excuse then?

02-14-2007, 05:41 PM

Give me a reason to. Don't say the change of manager, because results won't improve one bit. What will you use as an excuse then?

Just out of intrest, When Rhodes does finally go - who's going to be the new person you go gunning for? I'll give it two weeks and the new chairman will be given the same treatment as you give Rhodes jump:

Tarty

02-14-2007, 06:00 PM

Just out of intrest, When Rhodes does finally go - who's going to be the new person you go gunning for? I'll give it two weeks and the new chairman will be given the same treatment as you give Rhodes jump:

Lets hope that they don't do anything about new shirts....we will never hear the end of it jawdrop: :D